Learner Reviews & Feedback for Python Project for Data Science by IBM
About the Course
Top reviews
SH
Jun 8, 2023
This course is a good checkpoint to evaluate our understanding of the previous courses. The assignment had some challenges, but after revising the materials, it was successfully completed. Thank you.
LY
Feb 21, 2023
Lab works became more challenging and difficult throughout end of the course. Some tasks I've spent more than week just to find out the mistake. It is quite challenging yet fulfilling at the same time
776 - 800 of 866 Reviews for Python Project for Data Science
By Angela W
•Jun 7, 2022
For such a short course there was alot of information to get through.
By Anwar R
•Jun 15, 2023
You should add more projects and easy medium and complex task to do
By Tom F
•Feb 23, 2023
Very good introduction to the methodology, difficulties with Watson
By Rafael M S
•Nov 18, 2022
The Final Assignment has several errors when you execute the code.
By Krishanu P
•Jun 1, 2021
I learnt about web scrapping but this course could be much better.
By Swathy K P
•Nov 26, 2021
Labs and Assignments are extremely confusing but very informative
By Randall H
•Jan 19, 2025
You copy and paste everything because explanations are lacking
By Emem A
•Feb 21, 2023
it was a very tough course. i have to do some more learning
By Nguyen A
•Aug 23, 2022
final project has bugs and errors when running the code
By Dhanesh T
•Jun 18, 2022
A good beginner hands-on experience for Data Science.
By Marcia M
•Feb 22, 2022
Students had a lot of problems with IBM Watson Studio
By Brian F
•Jul 17, 2023
redundant examples.. could broaden and learn more.
By Marco B
•May 8, 2022
Jupyter on Watson Studio is not working properly
By Carmen F
•Aug 1, 2022
I think we need more hands on lab practices.
By Melquisedeck M d S
•Feb 12, 2025
Esperava um estudo de caso mais robusto.
By Elena E
•Feb 9, 2022
Informational, but too easy.
By Jason C
•Sep 12, 2021
Good practice project
By Daniele C N
•May 12, 2023
not very explanatory
By Rafael P S
•Nov 4, 2021
Nice but very basic.
By Tran N
•Feb 4, 2024
Too hard to follow
By Zheng Y
•Mar 9, 2025
so difficult
By greg i
•Jul 23, 2021
Encouraging
By Ilhom J
•Jun 21, 2024
Good
By Michael G
•Apr 26, 2022
good
By Frank H
•Jul 28, 2023
This course has too many issues:
The assignment rates items that are vague: If the quarterly data is demanded, then it should be spelled out and not just "the revenues"! To grade on this is ridiculous!
I was not able to see any links in the reviewed assignments - but I am starting to suspect I cannot see the Watson links! I could not get a Watson account, as the creation failed repeatedly despite me trying to troubleshoot it!
The used python version is old. Methods such as .append() are deprecated now! Also, who uses that python version locally? I would need a new env just for the course...
Some installs or imports gave warnings and failures, for example, for not using the version the employed jupyter version was expecting.
I got full marks despite some misunderstandings due to the vague new(!) text, because the people apparently seriously had enough. I am angry and embarassed that I deducted points in my reviews, as I followed the stupid guidelines! Do note that the new assignment version has new and vague texts. I lost all my previous work when it was updated too. Since it was some time I did it, I could not remmeber the quarterly shennenigans, for example. Kindly do not ask me to repeat this stupid assignment by changing the tables to quarterly, this is utterly repetitive. At least the weird tip to take the [1] (second) table now makes sense again. I marked it as an error in my notebook, as the yearly was demanded by my understanding of the text!
The exam should have been a new problem with at least some slight variations. It should be clearly spelled out what is expected.