The course contains some interesting insights on writing a scientific paper. What I like about the course is that it is given by graduate students. But this is also a drawback. Sometimes, the material seems too simplistic.

A well thought out topic, but not executed properly. It must have involved some senior faculty members in the process of delivery. There are pronunciation issues. Oral language was not clear at many places.

I would suggest to be more simple and effective. Discuss concrete cases and details of a about errors and structure of a paper. But really appreciate that the cours is given from PHDs students!

The content was fine and went pretty smoothly. The real problem was the hassle of getting the accent of most of the instructors. Plus, there're a lot of mistakes in the subtitles as well.

Good course for PHD students. Also, it can be beneficial for non academic papers which intended to be submitted industrial conferences.

The content of the course is good but the review process need to be improved. The assignments should be reviewed by the instructors

The course was short and concise. Very Insightful. However the assignments could be clearer

muy simple el contenido, me hubiera gustado más profundidad en todo y no tan divulgativo

INITIAL PEER GRADING WAS NOT VERY MATURE ENOUGH IN GRADING MY ASSIGNMENT SERIOUSLY..

It is good, but there is a student speaking that is really difficult to understand.

Exteremely good course for those who r doing research ....Thanks to whole Team.

This in an amazing course, lot of new things learn from this fruitful course

It is very good for undergraduate students starting their research projects

Please make it easier to understand the peer-grade assignment and process.

Can be improved further. Not very useful. Content is not so good.

not very useful because there are few examples of it.

A good summary on how to start thinking research!

The grading is a mess. The content is good.

Somewhat not really practical

Very basic

nice

Good

good

Good

Good