Great course, but too bulky.

Second half was better

Great course

The content ranges from good to just about average. Many concepts seem to be put together half-heartedly, and there are more comprehensive innovation frameworks available from a variety of other sources. What really brought down both, the enjoyment and the usefulness of this course were the speakers / presenters. Some were difficult to understand, others had a rather repetitive and annoying presentation style. Plus, it would have been a good idea to get the speakers' scripts reviewed by native English speakers. Finally, I can see how peer-reviewed assignments can seem an interesting use case, but in reality this is frustrating. Not only is the time frame within which assignments will be reviewed unpredictable – the quality of the marking /feedback is random, and that's not acceptable.

It does not fully utilize the power and possibilities of a MOOC (students cannot study at their own pace, there is no live interaction, standard quizes and assignments), which is a bit ironic.

Peer-reviewing really brings down the quality of the feedback. Not everyone is capable of testing, evaluating and giving constructive feedback.

The peer review assignments does not work as expected. It would be much appriciated if the course was converted to a quizz, so students doesn't waste time on a course where they don't get a grade because of missing reviews both ways.

From module 3 i could barely hear the lecturers

Tiresome and confusing.

It lacks the option of completing ahead of the schedule as the graded assignments are locked till the due data

the amount will be paid but I not received certificate