Awesome!

Awesome!

Good!

good

Good

good

good

good

good

good

Very

ok

:)

-

V

The instructor was very good at keeping one engaged and involved. The AI was also very good, as it explained concepts that were not clear. I've never had such a wonderful learning experience as i had with Coursera. I would recommend it. However, I'm giving a 4 star and not a 5 because I got to 99% completion of this course, and I never got a certificate. Module 5 Assignment D asked that we copy and paste our answers from the previous assignment. Whoever the AI did not accept the answer and read it that i was submitting someone else's work, which was actually my own work. The AI should have known because I submitted both assignments with my own name. I rephrased the answers but that did not work. I even changed the whole answer and rewrote the whole assignment again but that also was not accepted. I reached out to the help center which took quite some time to get back. I wish i could have had a live chat. The coursera help center reached out to me a day or so later via email and gave me suggestions I had explicitly explained that I had already tried which was telling , that my problem hadn't been carefully considered. After expressing my dissatisfaction and unhappiness in a subsequent email, the help center asked me to clear my cache history, which I did but that didn't work. I gave up out of frustration. What amazes me is that Coursera did not think that they should take responsibility for this and give me a certificate for the money and effort I had put into this. After not receiving an email response from me for 2 days, the help center sent me a message that they were assuming that the case had been solved because of my silence, so they were closing the case. They closed the case. However, they could see that my course is still 99% complete. The AI is good although not perfect and that is expected. But please don't lose your human touch. Be kind and considerate. Take responsibility. We are not just numbers.

Realy good lectures, interesting exercises and fun videos. While the production is not as good as the other courses on the specialization from the Univ. of Amsterdam, Gerben Moerman is extremely enthusiastic and teaches very clearly. The downsides are the abscence of any kind of support from the team (where are those Forum moderators UvA?), some little explained topics (the ethics discussion is very shallow), and an overcomplicated exercise in week 5 (assignment D, took me 3 weeks to get the energy to finish it). I'm also disappointed that this course seems like a "drifting ship", with no helmsman/woman to guide it. There is a general sense of lack of supervision (see the blatant plagiarism), despite most students really making an effort to learn.

I took this course to refresh my knowledge of qualitative research methods. Prof. Moerman is a very inspiring teacher in both theory and practice. The first part of the course (about epistomology, ontology, hermeneutics, phenomonology etc.) is rather challenging but also very interesting, so I decided to do some extra background reading. The second part is more practical and useful in everyday work. I was surprised however that there are not many current theories or views in this course, I recognised a lot from the time I went to university. But all in all, it was a great course! Thank you, Prof. Moerman and staff of the University of Amsterdam for this opportunity to learn from the best in my own time and pace.

This course is an excellent opportunity to gain knowledge on Qualitative Research. Prof. Gerben Moerman is one of the most excited teachers you'll ever 'watch' during any lesson, which makes it even more fun to watch all the lessons. On top of that, the course really touches upon the most important things about this kind of research in a very enjoyable (and not boring-lame-exhausting) way. You have to invest some serious time in doing your weekly tasks, but they are all interesting and easy to make you grab the essence of doing Qualitative Research. Overall, I enjoyed this course very much. It's a lot better than the experience I had at the faculty of religionstudies in Groningen, The Netherlands.

EXCELLENT lectures! The main negative is the lack of expert oversight. When students correct the work of other students without oversight, it is literally the blind leading the blind. One student marked me down on an issue that I know was correct, but no one of authority was there to say so. I confirmed my thoughts with a mentor, which took several days. Because of her answer, I know more about the issue, but the student who corrected me doesn't. He may still think his perspective is accurate. Other than that, I learned a lot and am very glad I took the course. I look forward to taking the next in the series.

Thank you for putting this course together. It provided a great introductory overview of qualitative research methods! In terms of feedback: I felt that the assignments could have been a bit more challenging. I felt some of them were too easy. Also, while completing my peer review tasks, I noted several times that many individuals failed to follow assignment instructions. Perhaps find a way to make these instructions more clear. With respect to course content, I would have liked to have seen more in depth information on how to conduct qualitative analysis (e.g., thematic analysis). Thanks again!

I truly enjoyed the course and the pedagogical lessons. Previously, I have struggled with the philosophical terms and I cannot claim of mastering them now but I definitely have a better clue. Thank you for the suggestions of literature, such as the book of Irving Seidman which I am now reading or the lectures of Graham Gibbs. The only small minus of the course is that I think qualitative analysis could have been given more space. Or are you planning a course on methods to analyse qualitative data?

Overall a good course, covering a lot of relevant issues. Most of the assignments were really aligned with the content of the course (doing a real interview, analyzing and writing about it. The midterm and final test, however, do include few questions and correct answers which are absolutely debatable. I enjoyed the enthusiasm of Gerben, but his intensive non-verbal gestures distracted me from the content. I am sure he can do without it. Thanks and kind regards

This is the second of 5-course specialization. The course is very well presented, from a very talented and devoted and knowledgeable instructor/professor. However, the course remains highly academic, with a huge focus on principles and theories. It is highly recommended for academic circles, particularly for the amount of bibliographic sources it provides (of which many are open source and available online).

Overall - well-designed course from a learning perspective. From an examination perspective, often the midterm and final exams did not match up to the topics covered as it did in the Quantitative Research Methods. Being unfamiliar with the course content, I'm sure an expert opinion (someone who is quite familiar with the material) could see the parts examined being similar enough to the content.