Learner Reviews & Feedback for Software Development Processes and Methodologies by University of Minnesota
About the Course
Top reviews
LP
Apr 18, 2020
Very nice course that provides good insight on software development practices and common problems. It provides also some insights on project management, highlighting pros and cons of different models.
DG
Dec 12, 2024
I've been delivering software for nearly two decades and was very helpful to do a refresher on the basics, options and evolution of the space. Well presented and engaging delivery of the topics.
401 - 425 of 425 Reviews for Software Development Processes and Methodologies
By Amit R Y
•Oct 28, 2021
good
By SRAVYA C V
•Oct 22, 2021
good
By SIBHI H V S 1
•Jul 29, 2020
N
i
c
e
By Tejaswini V
•Oct 1, 2019
Good
By addanki v v s p
•Dec 19, 2020
course is good actually, but the main problem is plagiarism issues, which is so terrific. i submit my works doing for my self , but i still get the issues of error. i don't know why this system was failed in detecting the real work vs copied work
By Sean S
•May 31, 2023
Good material, but assignments were too easy, and most peers I had to peer review were either bots or entering nonsense submissions.
By Nhat T (
•Mar 11, 2019
A good enough course. Material are sometimes difficult to follow. Assignment are quite different from what were being taught.
By Avanti M D
•Jan 26, 2021
Course is good. But it lags in detailed description. Slide presentation is not explained in detail.
By Alpish J
•Apr 4, 2020
It could have been better.But it was better than what my college taught.
By Neil S
•Nov 18, 2017
Very repetitive and not detailed enough.
By Katuri B
•Oct 26, 2021
good
By Sandhya P
•Jun 26, 2020
Nice
By KhuongNDHE172473
•Nov 2, 2023
ok
By DucTDHE171608
•May 26, 2023
no
By Sofiia R
•Sep 30, 2020
I didn't find the specialization and this course in particular useful. It has low quality videos, unstructured information, and doesn't give enough knowledge to start working.
Also, the last course of the specialization requires background in programming, otherwise you will not be able to complete the specialization.
By Hussein A
•Apr 19, 2020
There was a lot of overlap on the videos in fact the incremental model video had the dictation of the wrong video. Someone who primarily relys in text to study the dictations were extremely frustrating at the minimum it should be broken into paragraphs
By Marcelo H G
•May 16, 2019
Confuse, lack important details. Peer review strangely setup. Testing covered in OK way but lacks any kind of real world examples, practices or code.
By Jason L
•Sep 18, 2022
Too rigid in grading criteria. Takes the enjoyment out of the process.
By sai p
•Nov 1, 2020
good
By Stella v d E
•Aug 11, 2020
Quite disappointed in the quality of the course. The staff did not reply to comments in the discussion forum, there was no syllabus, at one point even links to youtube instead of creating their own content, and the quality of the assessments (especially the peer review ones) were quite poor. One criteria for a good rank was to write a "creative" story. Overall this course is nothing I would pay for.
By Ayako S
•Jul 20, 2022
Instrustor's knowledge and ecplanation were extremely poor, he didn't lecture all the needs to answer quizes, or weekly test. Extremely disappointed by lack of professional education
By Deleted A
•Jun 16, 2020
to bad the grading was not done still for one month .rating also waste for this course. my rating 0.00000000
many 0's
By GOPI K Y
•Oct 28, 2020
week 3 and 4 assignment is not opening and submitting
By denis s
•Aug 29, 2024
very verbose
By PATEL K R
•Sep 10, 2023
Not good...