Chevron Left
Back to Agile Software Development

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Agile Software Development by University of Minnesota

4.7
stars
7,349 ratings

About the Course

Software industry is going crazy on agile methods. It is rapidly becoming the choice for software development where requirements are unpredictable or is expected to change over time. This course will help you gain knowledge on what is agile? Why agile is better suited for these situations? We will also cover some of the most common agile frameworks like scrum and XP in depth. Prerequisite: You need basic knowledge of software development process and software development methodologies. After completing this course, you will be able to : 1) Demonstrate the ability to participate effectively in agile practices/process for software development. 2) Explain the purpose behind common agile practices. 3) Ability to apply agile principles and values to a given situation. 4) Ability to identify and address most common problems encountered in adopting Agile methods. Project: You will also be given opportunity to apply what you learn in this course. You will be given fictional case studies, where after studying the case study, you will have to exercise some of the practices, techniques, etc that team members of an agile team members are expected to know....

Top reviews

RG

Jan 24, 2022

One of the best course for Agile software methodology in order to understand each role and responsibility. It also describes the definition of the terms which are widely being used in Agile framework

SS

Jul 15, 2019

One of the best course for Agile software methodology in order to understand each role and responsibility. It also describes the definition of the terms which are widely being used in Agile framework

Filter by:

1526 - 1550 of 1,581 Reviews for Agile Software Development

By S S P

•

Aug 14, 2020

good

By Chandan

•

Jul 30, 2020

Good

By Nampelli V

•

Jun 26, 2020

done

By Aditya P

•

Jun 15, 2020

good

By Illa M P

•

Jun 2, 2020

Good

By Manoj P

•

Jun 2, 2020

good

By Adi N

•

May 4, 2020

Good

By Suman S

•

Apr 30, 2020

good

By AKASH B

•

Mar 11, 2020

good

By Yashasvi S

•

Jul 16, 2022

rge

By Pratiksha B

•

Jun 23, 2022

xyz

By Neeta M

•

May 19, 2024

na

By Sirisha V

•

Feb 20, 2023

NA

By Harshitha G

•

Jan 27, 2023

NA

By POOJA T

•

Apr 14, 2020

,.

By Swarali P

•

Nov 28, 2022

.

By Sanu S

•

Oct 27, 2021

,

By M V R C

•

Sep 22, 2021

By Abijith M

•

Aug 10, 2021

By pitambar s

•

Aug 19, 2020

G

By Pavan P

•

Aug 4, 2020

g

By PRATHAMESH K

•

Jun 1, 2020

.

By VARSHA K S

•

May 12, 2020

G

By Ramu B

•

May 5, 2020

I

By Paul G

•

Oct 5, 2020

Content was relevant. It could have been delivered in a more varied and engaging way. Different subject matter experts presenting on different topics. Accent very difficult to understand at times. Some of the assessment exercises focused on content that was barely covered while key elements seemed to get minimal focus at times. The level of plagiarism and copying evident in some of the peer-reviewed work was concerning.